Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An actionable, well-structured skill body with executable commands, complete payloads, and verification steps across all four workflows. The main gap is the lack of an explicit validation checkpoint before the destructive bulk-delete batch operation.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step before `cx parsing-rules bulk-delete --ids`, e.g. list rules first and confirm the target IDs before deleting, to satisfy the destructive/batch feedback-loop expectation.
Consider moving the inline custom-enrichment and requestEnrichments JSON shapes into the existing references structure to keep the body even leaner, mirroring the E2M schema split.
Reduce minor repetition of the "Always template from existing" guidance by stating it once prominently and referencing it, rather than restating it in each workflow and the Key Principles section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense with domain-specific knowledge Claude would not already know (CLI flags, JSON wire shapes, the TCO-tier compute model) and free of padding about general concepts; length is justified by covering four command groups. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands, complete JSON payloads (e.g. the v5 custom-enrichment shape and requestEnrichments structure), and copy-paste jq pipelines rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Each workflow is numbered with verify steps and the E2M section has strong troubleshooting feedback loops, but the destructive batch `cx parsing-rules bulk-delete` operation has no explicit validation checkpoint, which caps this dimension at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The complex E2M wire format is offloaded to a real, well-signaled one-level-deep reference (references/e2m-schemas.md, verified to exist), and the body is organized into clear navigable workflow sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |