Conciseness

The body is relentlessly lean: "Zero rows is an answer. Don't retry.", "Ids mean nothing outside this skill.", "Empty means nothing changed. Don't retry with a wider window." Every line is CLI-specific gotcha knowledge Claude cannot already know; there is no concept explanation or padding, matching anchor 5 ('every token earns its place').

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready bash with jq pipelines (e.g. `cx infra resources list --match-all Health=Critical -o json | jq '.resources[] | {name, failing: ...}'`) plus exact flag semantics, pagination loop condition ("Keep paging while start_row + returned_count < total_count"), and an outcome table for `config-diff`. Examples cover the common cases (list, health-history, config-changes, config-diff), matching anchor 5; `types`/`filters`/`raw-data` lack full invocation examples but their flags are precisely specified with a `--help` escape hatch.

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step processes are explicitly sequenced ("Two steps: find out which resources changed, then see what changed"; the numbered filters→list→zero-rows flow) with explicit verification steps and feedback loops: "Check with `config-diff` before telling the user something changed", "Over 100, the CLI refuses. Split into batches", "stderr gives the count", and error semantics for enablement failures and each `outcome`. All commands are read-only and batch behavior is validated, so the batch/destructive cap does not apply — anchor 5.

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure: a command table up top, well-labeled sections per topic, and cohesive placement. However, at ~146 lines with everything inlined (legacy flag semantics, the full `config-diff` outcome table, filter-grammar rules) and no bundle files or one-level-deep references, it sits between anchor 4 ('good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps') and anchor 5, which expects well-signaled external references or a compact single-file overview under the ~50-line exception that does not apply here.

Specificity

The description enumerates multiple concrete capabilities — "resource types, filterable attributes, resource lists, health, raw data and configuration changes" — tied to a specific CLI (`cx infra`), with comprehensive coverage and no vague language. It matches anchor 5 ('multiple specific concrete actions; comprehensive coverage') and exceeds anchor 4's 'minor gaps in coverage'.

Completeness

It answers 'what' explicitly ("Query Coralogix infrastructure resources with the `cx infra` CLI: resource types, filterable attributes, resource lists, health, raw data and configuration changes") and 'when' with an explicit "Use when the user asks to" clause followed by concrete trigger phrases — exactly the anchor 5 pattern. Voice is third person ('Query...'), so no person-penalty applies.

Trigger Term Quality

It quotes ~18 natural user phrases — "is this resource healthy", "why is this resource critical", "which health policy is failing", "get raw resource data", "configuration drift", "what was this config last week" — plus synonym variations like "what changed in this resource" / "which resources changed recently". This comprehensively covers natural terms including synonyms, matching anchor 5; nothing common appears missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear niche — Coralogix infrastructure resources via the `cx infra` CLI — and its triggers ("critical hosts in a region", "which health policy is failing", "what was this config last week") are infrastructure-specific, not generic resource queries. Overlap with telemetry/alerts/dashboards skills is minimal because the description never claims those domains, matching anchor 5's 'clear niche with distinct triggers'.