Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete, executable CLI commands and clearly sequenced workflows, but it is a dense single-file reference with some command repetition and missing validate→retry feedback loops for destructive and batch operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate/feedback loop for destructive and batch operations (e.g. after `delete` or `actions batch`, run a verify command and retry on failure) to lift workflow clarity above 2.
Move the four large CLI command tables into a separate reference file (e.g. references/cli-reference.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview pointing to it, improving progressive disclosure and reducing token weight.
De-duplicate commands that appear in both the CLI Commands tables and the workflow sections — reference the command by name in workflows rather than re-listing it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The four command tables densely enumerate ~80 subcommands and the workflow sections re-list many of the same commands, so it is mostly efficient but carries redundant repetition that could be tightened; it is not 3 because the repeated command listings pad the token budget, and not 1 because there is no conceptual fluff. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands appear throughout (e.g. `cx webhooks test <webhook-id>`, `cx notifications connectors create --from-file slack-connector.json`, "Template from existing: `cx <command> get <id> -o json > template.json`"), matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are clearly numbered and include test steps ("Test End-to-End", "Always test after setup"), but destructive/batch operations (delete, `cx webhooks actions batch`) lack explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops, which caps this dimension at 2 per the rubric; it is not 1 because sequencing and some checkpoints are present. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but at ~270 lines the large inline CLI reference tables are monolithic content that could be split into a separate reference file, and no bundle files exist to provide one-level-deep detail; it is not 3 because content that should be separate is inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |