Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, highly actionable body: copy-paste commands, a safe templating workflow, and explicit post-operation checks on affected alerts. The main room for improvement is tightening repetition and adding an explicit pre-write validation/recovery loop around the destructive update/delete operations.
Suggestions
Consolidate the `--yes` requirement and round-trip advice — each is currently stated in both the CLI Commands section and Key Principles — into a single location to trim redundant tokens.
Add a pre-write validation checkpoint to the create/update workflow (e.g., re-run `cx slos get` on the edited JSON's fields or dry-check required fields before `--yes`), plus a recovery note for what to do if the API rejects the payload.
State the `--yes` confirmation and the request-based vs. window-based distinction once each in the Definition/Health sections and drop the redundant restatements, which would let the body approach the lean token budget of the conciseness anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tables and code, but the `--yes` requirement is stated three times (table, bullet, Key Principles), the round-trip advice appears twice, and the opening sentence defines what an SLO is — minor instances of over-explanation and repetition that could be trimmed, matching level 4 rather than the lean level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash including a jq projection for list, a concrete get→edit→create round-trip, and update with flags — commands are specific and cover the common cases, matching the level-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clear (template from `get` → edit → create/update; list → compare attainment vs. target → pivot to telemetry skill) with an explicit post-check to review `effectedSloAlertIds`, but there is no pre-write validation of the JSON payload and no error-recovery loop — most checkpoints present with minor gaps, level 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with the Related Skills pointers clearly signaled and only one level deep, and nothing inlined that clearly belongs in a separate file; however, no bundle/reference files exist and the body runs ~84 lines (past the under-50-line simple-skill exception), so structure is good but not the exemplary split-and-navigate pattern of level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |