Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary narrow skill: it states the recognition cue (exact log signature), gives a complete copy-paste fix, provides a dry-run verification step with a non-obvious caveat, and explains the underlying mechanism in two precise sentences. It wastes no tokens and assumes Claude's competence throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place: a 20-line body with a Trigger, a Fix containing only the working snippet, a one-line dry-run verification, and a two-sentence 'Why' ('make expands `$x` in a variable value... it reads `$'` as an empty variable, so the closing quote disappears') that explains the exact failure mechanism rather than general make knowledge Claude already has. Nothing can be trimmed without losing value. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable and copy-paste ready: the GitHub Actions snippet shows the exact substitution (`make testacc "TESTARGS=-run '${RUN_PATTERN//\$/\$$}''`) including the env var pass-through, and verification is a concrete command (`make -n testacc "TESTARGS=..."`). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-action skill where the action is unambiguous, and it still includes an explicit validation checkpoint ('Check the result with `make -n testacc`') plus the warning that 'A pattern checked with `go test` directly does not prove that it works through `make`'. No destructive or batch operations, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-file skill with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist), organized into clearly labeled Trigger/Fix/Why sections. Per the simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections with no need for external references merit a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |