Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, single-purpose skill: concrete commands, precise git-level sequencing, and a rationale section that adds genuinely non-obvious context. The only gaps are the absence of an explicit post-generation verification step and unspecified harness wiring details. No bundle files exist or are needed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Three lean sections (Trigger/Fix/Why) with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; even the 'Why' section carries non-obvious, repo-specific rationale ('Goldens recorded after the switch describe the new code and cannot show what changed'). Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides an exact executable command ('UPDATE_GOLDEN=1 go test ./internal/provider -run Test<Resource>Baseline'), an exact branch target ('origin/master'), and precise commit/rebase ordering. Below 5 only because 'add only the baseline test, fake, and harness wiring' names artifacts without showing what that wiring entails. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear and correctly ordered (add baseline on master, record goldens, commit first, rebase the generate/switch commits on top), but there is no explicit post-generation validation step (e.g., re-running the test without UPDATE_GOLDEN to confirm goldens pass), matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and organized into well-labeled Trigger/Fix/Why sections with no need for external references; no bundle files exist and none are referenced. Per the simple-skill guideline this merits the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |