Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered audit skill: an actionable phased workflow with fallbacks, concrete platform-specific data, and a clean one-level reference structure. The only improvement opportunity is consolidating facts duplicated between the Phase 1 field lists and the Key Facts sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly all content is non-redundant, hard domain data Claude cannot be assumed to know (byte-vs-char keyword field, Vitals thresholds, per-store limits, tier rules); minor trimming is possible where the Phase 1 field lists and "Key Facts" sections repeat limits (30-char title, 170-char promo text). Anchor 4 rather than 3 because the padding is incidental duplication, not explanation of known concepts. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete instruction-only guidance: exact URL patterns, ready-to-use search strings, explicit tier thresholds and examples, dimension weights, grade bands, tier-aware checklist, and report rules ("Change subtitle from X to Y" not "Improve subtitle"). Matches anchor 5's fully executable coverage. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear phased sequence (identify/fetch → tier assessment → score → optional competitors → report) with explicit fallback checkpoints ("If WebFetch returns incomplete data… note gaps", "If browser tools are unavailable, ask the user to share a screenshot", "If you cannot confirm its presence, note this"). No destructive or batch operations, so the validation cap does not apply; anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that clearly signals five one-level-deep reference files, each annotated with its purpose; verified the referenced files exist and contain no nested references. Appropriate content split with easy navigation — anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |