competitor-alternatives

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

1.13x

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.13x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Evaluation results

100%

Head-to-Head Comparison Page: Formly vs TypeForm

You vs Competitor page structure and content depth

Criteria

Without context

With context

TL;DR at top

87%

100%

Paragraph comparisons

100%

Table beyond checkmarks

100%

Pricing tier-by-tier

100%

Hidden cost mention

100%

Migration section present

100%

Migration content depth

100%

Who TypeForm is best for

100%

Who Formly is best for

100%

Correct URL pattern

100%

Competitor data YAML

100%

Competitor strengths acknowledged

100%

13%

Best Alternatives Roundup Page: Tools Like Loom

Plural alternatives page with real options and YAML data

Criteria

Without context

With context

Multiple real alternatives

100%

Maximum alternatives count

100%

Client product listed first

100%

Criteria framework section

100%

TL;DR or intro summary

87%

100%

Per-alternative best-for

100%

Competitor YAML file

70%

100%

Correct URL pattern

37%

100%

Pain points section

50%

100%

Comparison summary table

100%

Use-case recommendations

100%

99%

14%

Competitor Comparison Content Hub Setup

Competitor hub architecture and centralized data structure

Criteria

Without context

With context

YAML files created

100%

YAML pricing tiers

100%

YAML strengths and weaknesses

100%

YAML best_for and not_ideal_for

100%

URL patterns all four formats

80%

90%

Index page structure

100%

Footer with index links

100%

Footer columns per format

100%

Internal linking strategy

100%

Page set plan with priority

37%

100%

Centralization rationale

100%

YAML migration notes

100%

Repository: coreyhaines31/marketingskills
Commit: 9d4d29a

Evaluated: 18 days ago
Agent: Claude Code
Model: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Head-to-Head Comparison Page: Formly vs TypeForm Best Alternatives Roundup Page: Tools Like Loom Competitor Comparison Content Hub Setup

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.