Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized catalog with genuinely useful marketing applications, but it is bloated by restating textbook psychology Claude already knows, and it ignores progressive disclosure entirely by inlining all 60 models. Trimming definitions to one-liners (or moving the catalog to a reference file) would roughly halve the token cost without losing value.
Suggestions
Cut the concept-definition sentence for each model — Claude already knows what the Sunk Cost Fallacy or Anchoring is — and keep only the name plus the 'Marketing application' line, roughly halving the body's token count.
Move the full model catalog into a reference file (e.g., references/models.md) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview with the Quick Reference table, task questions, and clearly signaled one-level-deep pointers.
Add one worked example showing the 4-step process applied to a real scenario (e.g., 'low trial-to-paid conversion') to make the workflow concrete end to end.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly half the body re-teaches psychology Claude already knows: each of the ~60 entries opens by defining standard concepts (Pareto Principle, Sunk Cost Fallacy, Anchoring, Loss Aversion, Scarcity) before adding the marketing application. That is 'several unnecessary explanations or padded sections' across the whole document, beyond the 'some unnecessary explanation' of anchor 3. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is mostly executable: a 4-step process, concrete per-model applications ('Three pricing tiers beat seven,' 'Show customer counts, testimonials, logos'), a challenge-to-model mapping table, and diagnostic questions. A worked end-to-end example is the main gap keeping it from anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'How to Use This Skill' gives a clear numbered sequence (identify models, explain the psychology, provide marketing applications, suggest ethical implementation) reinforced by the Quick Reference table and Task-Specific Questions. The skill is advisory rather than destructive/batch, so no validation cap applies; only minor checkpoint gaps keep it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized (seven thematic groups, quick-reference table, related skills), but the ~450-line catalog of 60 models is entirely inlined with no reference files at all — content that clearly belongs in one or more separate reference documents sits in SKILL.md. This fits the 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor better than anchor 2's 'minimal structure.' | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |