Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured advisory skill: lean bullet-based overview, concrete templates and copy formulas for the common paywall types, and clean offloading of experiment ideas and mobile-specific mechanics to two real, clearly signaled reference files. The main gap is workflow clarity — the assessment phase is sequenced but the recommendation and testing phases lack explicit checkpoints or decision gates.
Suggestions
Add an explicit end-to-end workflow (e.g., 1. read product-marketing context, 2. ask the unanswered assessment questions, 3. select paywall type and trigger, 4. draft screen from the template, 5. propose experiments and metrics) so the sequence from assessment to recommendation to testing is explicit rather than implicit.
Include one worked example with real copy (not just [Feature]/[Benefit] placeholders) so the templates double as concrete quality benchmarks.
Add a short validation checkpoint before recommending (e.g., confirm current conversion rate and trigger inventory against the Task-Specific Questions) so recommendations are gated on confirmed inputs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is written in terse bullets with compact ASCII wireframes and no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows. A few generic platitudes ("Minimize steps," "Immediate access to features") could be trimmed, keeping it just below the lean anchor 5 but clearly above anchor 3's over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, actionable guidance throughout for an instruction-only skill: copy formulas ("Unlock [Feature] to [Benefit]"), three wireframe templates, specific numbers ("Early warnings (7, 3, 1 day)," "Cool-down after dismiss (days, not hours)"), and named metrics. It stays below 5 because the templates use placeholders rather than worked examples and offer no measurement implementation detail. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Initial Assessment is well sequenced (check the product-marketing context file, ask only uncovered questions, then understand context/product model/journey), but the recommend-then-test flow that follows has no explicit checkpoints or decision gates — the overall sequence is implicit. It fits anchor 3 (sequence present, checkpoints missing/implicit) better than anchor 4, which requires most checkpoints to be present; the destructive/batch cap does not apply to this advisory skill. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview and both bundle files (references/experiments.md and references/mobile-subscription-paywalls.md) exist, are one level deep with no nested references, and are clearly signaled with descriptive link text explaining when each applies. This matches the anchor-5 pattern of a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |