Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary orchestration skill: a compact overview that routes each phase to a specific reference file, with explicit validation gates and routing rules. The only weaknesses are occasional convoluted sentence construction and small actionability details deferred to references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and almost entirely skill-specific machinery with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but a few run-on legalistic sentences (e.g., the "Done, on the brainstorm path" clause chain) could be tightened, matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact paths ("<root>/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-<type>-<topic>-plan.<md|html>"), commands ("git rev-parse --show-toplevel"), and explicit frontmatter keys — with minor gaps left to the reference files, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A phase-ordered table specifies what to read at each step, and there is an explicit validation checkpoint ("do not declare it written or enter Phase 4 while any check fails" in the Ready for Planning Check) with a blocking feedback loop, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview with a table of clearly signaled, one-level-deep references (all verified to exist in references/), with the bulk detail correctly split into per-phase files, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |