Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, actionable reference with concrete commands and useful guards, respecting token budget while remaining clear. It is held back from top marks only by minor verbosity in formula descriptions, a lack of output/error examples, and the absence of bundle files for the large formula/convoy catalogs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with terse command examples and inline comments and no padding about concepts Claude already knows, matching 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'; a few formula blurbs are slightly prose-y, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready `gc sling`/`gc convoy`/`gc order` commands with real flags and placeholders covering the common cases, matching 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'; missing output/error examples keep it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Dispatch flows are organized by type with implicit sequencing, and guards like 'Beads must be in the agent's rig database' and the cross-rig block act as validation checkpoints plus a migration note, matching 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a single self-contained file with clear section headers (Quick reference, Targeting, Formulas, Convoys, Orders) and no nested references, matching 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps'; it is a 4 rather than 5 because the formula/convoy/order catalogs are inlined and could be split into bundle files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |