Content
83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, fully executable command reference that assumes Claude's competence and covers the common CRUD cases. Its main weakness is the absence of validation checkpoints for state-changing and multi-agent dispatch operations, which caps workflow clarity at 3.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation checkpoints for state-changing steps, e.g. run `bd show <id>` to confirm status is in_progress before `bd close <id>`, and verify a bead exists in the target rig's database before claiming or slinging it.
Add a brief feedback loop for errors, such as re-running `bd list --dir <rig>` to confirm a created bead landed in the expected rig database.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean command reference with tight one-line examples and inline comments; every prose line carries non-obvious domain rules (ID prefix -> rig) with no padding of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste `bd` and `gc` commands cover the common cases (create, list, find, claim, update, close, hooks) with specific flags and placeholders. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections follow the bead lifecycle (create -> find -> claim -> close -> hooks), but state-changing batch/multi-agent operations lack explicit validation checkpoints, capping workflow clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the ~62-line single-purpose skill is cleanly organized into well-named sections with easy navigation; a couple of prose paragraphs that could live as references keep it just below a clean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |