packmind-create-command
tessl i github:cteyton/packmind --skill packmind-create-commandGuide for creating reusable commands via the Packmind CLI. This skill should be used when users want to create a new command that captures multi-step workflows, recipes, or task automation for distribution to Claude.
Validation
88%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
Total | 14 / 16 Passed | |
Implementation
77%This is a well-structured, actionable skill with clear workflow steps and validation checkpoints. The main weakness is verbosity in the introductory sections explaining concepts Claude already understands, and the monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting reference material into separate files.
Suggestions
Remove or significantly condense the 'About Commands' and 'What Commands Provide' sections - Claude understands these concepts and they add ~40 lines of unnecessary context.
Move the 'Complete Example' and 'Quick Reference' sections to a separate REFERENCE.md file and link to it, reducing the main skill's token footprint.
Condense the 'Good/Bad' examples in Step 2 into a single inline example each rather than separate labeled sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill contains some unnecessary explanation (e.g., 'About Commands' section explaining what commands provide, which Claude can infer). The content is mostly efficient but could be tightened by removing conceptual explanations and focusing purely on the creation process. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable CLI commands, complete JSON examples with proper structure, and copy-paste ready code snippets. The playbook structure is concrete with a complete working example at the end. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 4 requires user approval before proceeding), error handling/troubleshooting section, and conditional cleanup logic. The workflow includes feedback loops for user changes and retry scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-structured with clear sections, but the skill is monolithic at ~250 lines. The validation requirements, troubleshooting, and complete example could be split into separate reference files. No external file references are provided. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Activation
67%The description adequately covers both what the skill does and when to use it, earning full marks for completeness. However, it lacks specific concrete actions beyond 'creating commands' and could benefit from more natural trigger terms that users would actually say. The Packmind CLI reference provides some distinctiveness but the broader automation terminology creates potential overlap risk.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions like 'define command parameters', 'package workflows', 'export commands', or 'configure automation steps'
Include additional natural trigger terms users might say such as 'script', 'macro', 'template', 'automate', 'package command', or 'share workflow'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Packmind CLI, reusable commands) and mentions some actions ('creating', 'captures multi-step workflows'), but lacks comprehensive concrete actions like specific CLI commands or detailed workflow steps. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Guide for creating reusable commands via the Packmind CLI') and when ('when users want to create a new command that captures multi-step workflows, recipes, or task automation for distribution to Claude'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant terms ('command', 'CLI', 'workflows', 'recipes', 'task automation') but misses common variations users might say like 'script', 'macro', 'template', or 'automate tasks'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Mentions 'Packmind CLI' which is specific, but terms like 'workflows', 'task automation', and 'commands' could overlap with general automation or scripting skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.