tessl i github:cteyton/packmind --skill packmind-create-standardGuide for creating coding standards via the Packmind CLI. This skill should be used when users want to create a new coding standard (or add rules to an existing standard) that captures team conventions, best practices, or coding guidelines for distribution to Claude.
Validation
88%| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
Total | 14 / 16 Passed | |
Implementation
77%This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill with excellent workflow clarity including validation checkpoints and user approval gates. The main weakness is verbosity - the introductory sections explaining what standards are and their benefits add ~100 lines that Claude doesn't need. The content would benefit from splitting reference material (JSON schema, language values, field descriptions) into a separate file.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically shorten the 'About Coding Standards' and 'What Standards Provide' sections - Claude understands these concepts
Move the JSON schema reference, valid language values list, and Quick Reference table to a separate REFERENCE.md file
Consolidate the duplicate 'Valid language values' lists (appears in both Step 3 and Step 4) into a single reference
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill contains some unnecessary explanations (e.g., 'What Standards Provide' section explaining benefits Claude already understands, verbose 'About Coding Standards' intro). The content could be tightened significantly while preserving all actionable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands, complete JSON schemas, concrete examples with valid/invalid patterns, and copy-paste ready CLI commands. The complete example at the end demonstrates exactly what to produce. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Excellent 8-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 5 requires user approval, Step 6 re-reads and compares files, cleanup only on success). Includes clear feedback loops for error recovery and troubleshooting section. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-structured with clear sections, but the skill is monolithic (~400 lines) with no references to external files. The 'About Coding Standards' and 'Standard Structure' sections could be moved to a reference file, keeping SKILL.md focused on the workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Activation
75%This description effectively communicates when to use the skill with explicit trigger conditions and has a distinct niche due to the Packmind CLI focus. However, it could benefit from more specific concrete actions (what exactly does creating a standard involve?) and broader trigger term coverage to catch more natural user phrasings.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions like 'define naming conventions, document code patterns, specify formatting rules, export standards'
Expand trigger terms to include variations like 'style guide', 'code rules', 'team standards', 'linting', or 'code conventions'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (coding standards via Packmind CLI) and mentions actions like 'creating' and 'add rules', but lacks comprehensive concrete actions like specific operations or outputs. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('creating coding standards via Packmind CLI') and when ('when users want to create a new coding standard or add rules to an existing standard'), with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant terms like 'coding standard', 'rules', 'conventions', 'best practices', 'coding guidelines', but misses common variations users might say like 'style guide', 'code rules', 'linting rules', or 'team standards'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The specific mention of 'Packmind CLI' and the focus on 'coding standards for distribution to Claude' creates a clear niche that is unlikely to conflict with general coding or documentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Reviewed
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.