CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

packmind-standard-creator

Guide for creating coding standards via the Packmind CLI. This skill should be used when users want to create a new coding standard (or add rules to an existing standard) that captures team conventions, best practices, or coding guidelines for distribution to Claude.

69

Quality

84%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validation-backed workflow and properly referenced script bundle files. Its main weakness is conciseness: it explains background concepts Claude already knows and repeats the playbook JSON structure.

Suggestions

Remove or drastically trim the 'About Coding Standards' and 'What Standards Provide' sections, which restate concepts Claude already knows.

Show the playbook JSON structure only once (Step 3) and reference it from the earlier 'Standard Structure' section to eliminate duplication.

Move the large 'Complete Example' into a separate reference file (e.g. references/example.playbook.json) and link to it, improving progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The 'About Coding Standards' and 'What Standards Provide' sections explain concepts Claude already knows, and the JSON playbook structure is shown twice (Standard Structure and Step 3), making this more than minor over-explanation.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (init_playbook.py, validate_playbook.py, packmind-cli standard create) plus complete JSON templates and troubleshooting, covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear six-step sequence includes an explicit validation checkpoint with a fix-and-retry feedback loop ('If validation fails, fix the reported errors and run validation again before proceeding') and a verification step.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Clear section structure with real, correctly referenced script bundle files (scripts/init_playbook.py, scripts/validate_playbook.py); bulk content such as the complete example and 'About' section is inlined rather than split into separate reference docs, a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it clearly states what the skill does, when to use it with explicit trigger phrasing, and occupies a distinct niche via the Packmind CLI framing. Minor gaps in concrete-action specificity and natural-term coverage keep specificity and trigger quality at 4 rather than 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('create a new coding standard', 'add rules to an existing standard') but the 'captures team conventions, best practices, or coding guidelines' clause is somewhat abstract rather than a discrete action, leaving minor gaps versus a full 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Guide for creating coding standards via the Packmind CLI') and 'when' ('This skill should be used when users want to create a new coding standard (or add rules to an existing standard)') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases are present ('create a new coding standard', 'add rules', 'team conventions', 'best practices', 'coding guidelines', 'Packmind CLI'), but common synonyms/extensions like 'playbook' or '.playbook.json' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tied to a clear niche ('Packmind CLI', 'coding standard') with distinct triggers and minimal risk of overlapping with unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cteyton/packmind
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.