Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model of token efficiency: a single unambiguous, imperative instruction with no padding and no structure the skill doesn't need. Its only weakness is the absence of a brief example showing the desired plain-language restatement style, which keeps actionability at 4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is two lean lines — "Restate your last message. Stop using jargon and speak coherently. State it more simply and concisely, like one human talking to another." — with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is direct, imperative, and executable for an instruction-only skill (restate, drop jargon, be simpler and more conversational), with only a minor gap — no example of the before/after transformation to anchor the desired style. It sits between 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' and fully concrete instruction, hence 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-task skill and the single action is unambiguous: restate the last message plainly. Per the rubric's simple-skill exception, workflow clarity can score 5 for an unambiguous single action, and no validation checkpoints are relevant to a non-destructive restatement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ do not exist), and nothing in the body belongs in a separate file. Per the rubric's small-skill guidance, an appropriately self-contained two-line body with no external-reference need scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |