Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured for a simple orchestration skill, with a clear trigger and clean guardrails. Its main weakness is actionability: the workflow does not specify what to pass to the subagent or how to handle its result.
Suggestions
Add concrete detail on how to invoke `agents-memory-updater` (e.g. what context or prior-chat range to pass) and what the returned result looks like.
Optionally include a short example of the updater result and how it should be surfaced back to the user.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~20 lines) with well-organized sections and no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps name a concrete subagent ('Call agents-memory-updater') and an explicit return action, but miss key details such as what context to pass the subagent and how to format or surface its result. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple orchestration skill with an unambiguous two-step sequence; because the work is delegated, no destructive/batch validation checkpoint is required, so the clear sequence earns a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references; the body is well-organized into Trigger, Workflow, and Guardrails sections, which satisfies the simple-skill bar. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |