Monitor PR checks and fix failures until green. Uses gh pr checks as the source of truth for PR-attached checks.
83
78%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./cursor-team-kit/skills/loop-on-ci/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
57%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description communicates a clear and distinct purpose—monitoring and fixing PR check failures—with a specific tool reference (gh pr checks). However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause and could benefit from more natural trigger terms users might say (e.g., 'CI failing', 'build broken', 'tests not passing'). The specificity of actions could also be improved by listing concrete steps taken.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to fix failing CI, get PR checks to pass, or debug build/test failures on a pull request.'
Include more natural trigger terms users would say: 'CI', 'pipeline', 'build failing', 'tests failing', 'GitHub Actions', 'checks not passing', 'red checks'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (PR checks) and some actions (monitor, fix failures), but doesn't list specific concrete actions like 'analyze CI logs', 'push fixes', 'rerun flaky tests', etc. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers 'what' (monitor PR checks and fix failures) but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause. The 'when' is only implied by the nature of the task. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant terms like 'PR checks', 'gh pr checks', 'fix failures', and 'green', but misses common user variations like 'CI', 'pipeline', 'build failing', 'tests failing', 'GitHub Actions', 'checks not passing'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Has a clear niche focused specifically on PR check monitoring and remediation using 'gh pr checks'. This is distinct enough to avoid conflicts with general coding, testing, or git skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent, well-crafted skill that is concise, actionable, and clearly structured. It provides executable commands, a clear workflow with validation checkpoints, and practical guardrails for edge cases (flaky tests, unrelated failures). The content respects Claude's intelligence while adding genuine value about the specific tool usage patterns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is lean and purposeful. No unnecessary explanations of what CI is, what gh does, or how PRs work. The trigger section efficiently explains why gh pr checks is preferred over gh run list. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides specific, copy-paste-ready gh CLI commands with exact flags and JSON field selectors. The commands section covers all key operations needed for the workflow, and the guardrails give concrete decision rules (e.g., merge main for unrelated failures, retry once for flakes). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with explicit checkpoints: inspect before waiting, diagnose failures before fixing, re-check after every push, and repeat until green. The guardrails section adds feedback loops (re-run checks after push, retry flakes once) and the workflow handles both already-failed and pending states. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a focused, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Trigger, Workflow, Commands, Guardrails, Output) that are easy to scan and navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
7dd9fea
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.