CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

loop-on-ci

Monitor PR checks and fix failures until green. Uses gh pr checks as the source of truth for PR-attached checks.

66

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./cursor-team-kit/skills/loop-on-ci/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is an excellent, well-crafted skill that is concise, actionable, and clearly structured. It provides executable commands, a clear iterative workflow with feedback loops, and practical guardrails for edge cases (flaky tests, unrelated failures). The content respects Claude's intelligence while adding genuinely useful operational guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every section is lean and purposeful. No unnecessary explanations of what gh CLI is or how CI works. The trigger section efficiently explains why gh pr checks is preferred over gh run list. Every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides specific, copy-paste-ready gh CLI commands with exact flags and JSON field selectors. The commands section covers all key operations (resolve PR, inspect checks, watch, view logs) with concrete executable examples.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear 5-step sequence with explicit decision points (already failed vs pending), a feedback loop (re-check after every push and repeat until green), and guardrails that serve as validation checkpoints (scoped fixes, no --no-verify, flake handling, re-running checks after push).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a focused, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Trigger, Workflow, Commands, Guardrails, Output) that are easy to scan and navigate.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates a clear purpose around monitoring and fixing PR check failures using the GitHub CLI, which gives it a distinct niche. However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause and misses common trigger terms users might naturally use (e.g., 'CI failing', 'build broken', 'GitHub Actions'). Adding explicit trigger guidance and broader keyword coverage would significantly improve skill selection accuracy.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to fix failing PR checks, CI failures, or wants to get a PR to pass all checks.'

Include common trigger term variations such as 'CI', 'pipeline', 'build failing', 'tests failing', 'GitHub Actions', 'checks not passing'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (PR checks) and some actions (monitor, fix failures), but doesn't list specific concrete actions like 'analyze CI logs', 'push fixes', 'rerun flaky tests', etc. The phrase 'fix failures until green' is somewhat concrete but still high-level.

2 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is reasonably clear (monitor PR checks and fix failures), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance. The 'when' is only implied by the nature of the task described.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms like 'PR checks', 'gh pr checks', 'failures', and 'green', but misses common user variations like 'CI', 'pipeline', 'build failing', 'tests failing', 'GitHub Actions', 'check status', or 'PR not passing'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

This is a fairly distinct niche — monitoring PR-attached checks via 'gh pr checks' and iterating until green. It's unlikely to conflict with general coding skills or other CI-related skills due to the specific mention of PR checks and the gh CLI tool.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cursor/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.