Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured body that provides executable git commands and, importantly, explicit validation for the destructive history-rewrite operation. It is slightly short of fully copy-paste-ready actionability and an explicit fix-retry feedback loop, landing at the high end on most dimensions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~60-line body with no padding or explanation of git/PR concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable bash (gh pr view, git rev-parse, git diff --stat) with PR-specific placeholders, but the Reviewer Guidance section is instructional rather than command-backed, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered workflow plus an explicit destructive-operation validation checkpoint (capture ORIGINAL_TREE, compare trees after rewrite, 'Do not push if the tree changed unintentionally'); the recovery path on mismatch is stated as 'do not push' rather than a fix-and-retry loop, so it sits just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (Workflow, History Cleanup, Reviewer Guidance, Guardrails) with no need for external references; content is appropriately self-contained and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |