make-pr-easy-to-review

Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A compact, well-structured skill body that gives executable commands, a sequenced workflow with a real validation feedback loop for a destructive operation, and clean sectioning without padding. It respects token budget while remaining highly actionable.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no preamble explaining what a PR or a tree hash is, and each section earns its tokens.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides real executable gh/git commands (e.g. 'gh pr view <PR> --json ...', 'git rev-parse origin/<headRefName>^{tree}') plus concrete reviewer-note guidance, not pseudocode or abstraction.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with an explicit validation checkpoint (comparing ORIGINAL_TREE to HEAD tree before pushing) for the destructive history-rewrite path, so it is not capped at 2.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Workflow, History Cleanup, Reviewer Guidance, Guardrails) and no need for external references, satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that names concrete capabilities and pairs them with natural-language triggers answering both 'what' and 'when'. It avoids fluff and is clearly distinct from other skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance' — rather than vague language, matching the top anchor.	3 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly answers both what it does (prepare PRs for review via three actions) and when to use it (an explicit 'Use for' trigger clause), so it is not capped at 2.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	The 'Use for' clause supplies natural phrases users would actually say ('make this easy to review', 'tidy this PR', 'clean up commits', 'annotate the diff'), giving good coverage.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It occupies a clear niche — PR reviewability prep without behavior changes — with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: cursor/plugins
Commit: 0452e08

Reviewed: 14 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.