CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

make-pr-easy-to-review

Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, actionable skill body with executable git/gh commands, a clear sequenced workflow, and an explicit verification gate for the destructive history-rewrite step. It is well-organized and needs no external references.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's knowledge of git/PRs; the dependency-order grouping is useful non-obvious guidance rather than padded explanation, so it is not the mostly-efficient-but-tightenable anchor at 2.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable commands (gh pr view, git fetch, tree hashing, git diff --stat) with appropriate placeholders, matching the copy-paste-ready anchor rather than the pseudocode anchor at 2.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A sequenced 5-step workflow plus a history-rewrite section with an explicit validation checkpoint (verify content identity, 'Do not push if the tree changed unintentionally'), so the missing-validation cap at 2 does not apply.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files are needed; the self-contained body is well-sectioned into Workflow, History Cleanup, Reviewer Guidance, and Guardrails, satisfying the under-~50-line well-organized anchor at 3.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description that states three concrete capabilities and gives explicit, natural trigger phrasings. It cleanly answers both what the skill does and when to use it with minimal conflict risk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists three concrete actions — 'cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance' — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor rather than the domain-plus-some-actions anchor at 2.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ('Prepare PRs for review by...') and when ('Use for...') with an explicit trigger clause, so the missing-trigger cap at 2 does not apply.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrasings 'make this easy to review', 'tidy this PR', 'clean up commits', and 'annotate the diff' give good coverage of terms a user would actually say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear PR-review-tidying niche with distinct triggers, making conflict with other skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cursor/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.