CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pr-review-canvas

Render a PR diff review as a Cursor Canvas that groups changes by reviewer importance, separates boilerplate from core logic, and highlights tricky or unexpected code. Use when reviewing a pull request, summarizing a diff for review, or when the user asks for a PR review canvas, diff walkthrough, or change-set overview.

70

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill that clearly defines a workflow for reorganizing PR diffs into reviewer-optimized canvases. Its strengths are in workflow clarity and progressive disclosure, with appropriate references to the canvas SDK and policy files. Its main weakness is the lack of concrete, executable examples — a sample canvas output or a before/after example would significantly improve actionability.

Suggestions

Add a concrete example showing a small PR diff input and the expected canvas output structure (even abbreviated) to improve actionability.

Tighten the 'Be creative' section — the long enumeration of possible representations could be condensed to 1-2 sentences plus a short bullet list.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but some sections are slightly verbose — e.g., the 'Be creative' section and the 'Tone and content' section could be tightened. The enumeration of example representations in 'Be creative' is borderline padding.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides clear structural guidance (grouping strategy, callout tags, pseudocode approach) and a concrete command (`gh pr diff <pr>`), but lacks executable code examples, sample canvas output, or a concrete example of what a finished review canvas looks like. The guidance is specific but not copy-paste ready.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The workflow is clearly sequenced: check for PR link → gather diff → group changes → distill complex logic → trace tricky logic → add callouts → write commentary. The explicit gate ('If the user didn't provide a PR link, stop and ask') serves as a validation checkpoint. The ordering of sections maps directly to the execution order.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill appropriately references external files (`SKILL.md` for canvas policy, `index.d.ts` for SDK surface) as one-level-deep references with clear paths. The content itself is well-organized into logical sections without being monolithic, and the skill stays at the right level of abstraction for an overview.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (grouping by importance, separating boilerplate, highlighting tricky code), includes a comprehensive 'Use when' clause with natural trigger terms, and occupies a distinct niche combining PR review with Cursor Canvas rendering. It is concise, uses third-person voice throughout, and provides enough detail for accurate skill selection.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Render a PR diff review as a Cursor Canvas', 'groups changes by reviewer importance', 'separates boilerplate from core logic', 'highlights tricky or unexpected code'. These are clear, actionable capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (render PR diff review as Canvas, group by importance, separate boilerplate, highlight tricky code) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing multiple trigger scenarios.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'pull request', 'diff', 'PR review', 'diff walkthrough', 'change-set overview', 'reviewing a pull request', 'summarizing a diff'. Good coverage of variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive: the combination of PR diff review + Cursor Canvas rendering + grouping by reviewer importance creates a very specific niche. The mention of 'Cursor Canvas' as the output format and the specific review methodology make it unlikely to conflict with generic code review or diff tools.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cursor/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.