CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ralph-loop-help

Explain the Ralph Loop plugin, how it works, and available skills. Use when the user asks for help with ralph loop, wants to understand the technique, or needs usage examples.

63

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./ralph-loop/skills/ralph-loop-help/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable help document that gives Claude concrete commands and a clear explanation of the Ralph Loop technique. The main improvement opportunity is removing the duplicated iteration explanation between the 'What is' and 'How it works' sections.

Suggestions

Merge the 'What is Ralph Loop' iteration steps and the 'How it works' steps under Starting a Ralph Loop into a single description to remove the redundancy.

Add an explicit example of the cancel invocation (e.g. the exact phrase the user would say) to match the concreteness of the start command.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean and assumes competence, but the iteration mechanism is described twice (the 6-step 'What is Ralph Loop' list and the 5-step 'How it works' list under Starting), a minor redundancy that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-pasteable material is provided (the start command with flags and the <promise>TASK COMPLETE</promise> example), with only minor gaps such as the cancel command wording being left implicit.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The loop mechanism is laid out in clearly numbered sequences and the start/cancel/complete flows are distinguishable; this is an explanatory rather than destructive skill so validation checkpoints are not required.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections and is self-contained with appropriate external 'Learn More' links; no bundle files exist or are needed, so structure is good with only minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid description that clearly states both purpose and trigger conditions in third person, with a distinctive niche term. The main weakness is that the stated actions are abstract (explain/understand) rather than enumerating concrete capabilities.

Suggestions

Replace abstract verbs ('Explain', 'understand') with concrete actions, e.g. 'Describe how Ralph Loop works, list its options, and show usage examples'.

Add a natural synonym such as 'Ralph Wiggum technique' or 'self-referential AI loop' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain (Ralph Loop) with a couple of actions ('Explain the Ralph Loop plugin, how it works, and available skills'), but the actions are abstract (explain/understand) rather than multiple concrete operations, matching the '1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive' anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It has both a clear 'what' (Explain the plugin, how it works, available skills) and an explicit 'Use when...' clause, but the 'what' is slightly abstract so it falls short of the fully concrete trigger-phrase anchor of 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Phrases like 'help with ralph loop', 'wants to understand the technique', and 'needs usage examples' are natural things a user would say, giving good keyword coverage with only a few synonyms missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Ralph Loop' is a clear niche term with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for an unrelated skill and presenting minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cursor/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.