CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ralph-loop

Start a Ralph Loop for iterative self-referential development. Use when the user asks to run a ralph loop, start an iterative loop, or wants repeated autonomous iteration on a task until completion.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, concise skill that provides clear actionable instructions for setting up a Ralph loop. Its main weakness is the lack of validation steps—there's no guidance on verifying the scratchpad was written correctly, handling stop hook failures, or recovering from malformed state. The guardrails section is a nice touch for safety but could benefit from more explicit error handling.

Suggestions

Add a validation step after writing the scratchpad file (e.g., read it back and verify the YAML frontmatter parses correctly before confirming the loop is active)

Add error recovery guidance for when the stop hook doesn't fire or the scratchpad becomes corrupted mid-loop

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient. It doesn't explain what iterative loops are or how agents work—it assumes Claude's competence. Every section serves a clear purpose with no padding or unnecessary context.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides a concrete file format with exact markdown structure, a specific file path (.cursor/ralph/scratchpad.md), a worked example, and clear parameters with defaults. The instructions are copy-paste ready and unambiguous.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The steps are clearly sequenced (gather params → create file → confirm → begin work), but there's no validation checkpoint after writing the state file, and no error recovery guidance if the stop hook fails or the scratchpad format is malformed. For an iterative autonomous loop, missing feedback/validation steps is a notable gap.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Trigger, Workflow, Guardrails, Output). The structure is appropriate for the skill's complexity.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has strong trigger terms, explicit 'Use when' guidance, and a distinctive identity through the 'Ralph Loop' branding. Its main weakness is that the specificity of what the loop actually does is somewhat vague—'iterative self-referential development' and 'repeated autonomous iteration on a task' don't convey concrete actions or steps. Adding more detail about what happens during the loop would strengthen the description.

Suggestions

Add concrete actions describing what the Ralph Loop does, e.g., 'Executes a cycle of code generation, self-review, and refinement' rather than the abstract 'iterative self-referential development'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ('iterative self-referential development') and one action ('Start a Ralph Loop'), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions or explain what the loop actually does beyond vague 'iterative self-referential development' and 'repeated autonomous iteration on a task until completion'.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (start a Ralph Loop for iterative self-referential development) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple trigger scenarios: run a ralph loop, start an iterative loop, or wants repeated autonomous iteration).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger terms users would say: 'ralph loop', 'iterative loop', 'repeated autonomous iteration', 'until completion'. These cover the likely phrasings a user would employ when requesting this specific workflow.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The term 'Ralph Loop' is highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with other skills. The specific naming convention creates a clear niche that wouldn't be confused with general iteration or looping constructs.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cursor/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.