Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-organized, and clearly sequenced with a sensible guardrail checkpoint. The main gap is actionability — providing the actual git commands to collect authored commits would make the guidance copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned (Trigger, Workflow, Guardrails, Output) with no concept-padding or unnecessary explanation; every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps carry concrete parameters (7-10 days, exclude merge commits, 2-5 bullets, three classification categories), but no executable git commands are given and 'primary branch context' is left vague. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step numbered sequence with an explicit checkpoint ('If git email is missing, ask the user to set it before proceeding'); for this simple single-purpose skill, the well-organized flow satisfies the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with a single task and no need for external references; the four clearly labeled sections provide appropriate organization, satisfying the simple-skill guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |