CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

workflow-from-chats

Extract durable working preferences from recent Cursor chats and convert them into skills, rules, or workflow docs. Use when asked to learn preferences, mine feedback, personalize workflows, or generate team/person-specific agent guidance.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An efficient, well-organized instruction-only skill that provides concrete procedural guidance with genuine validation gates. Adding a worked example and an explicit artifact-verification step would round out the few remaining gaps.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean 46-line body organized into terse sections with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance (named inventory fields, seven-field preference atoms, explicit scan markers and artifact criteria), but lacks worked examples illustrating a filled atom or sample output.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear eight-step sequence with real checkpoints (confidence rating, 'ask the user before writing files' for contradicted evidence, no-artifact escape); the gap is no explicit verification step on the drafted artifact.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no need for external references and clean section headers (Scope, Workflow, Confidence, Artifact Choice, Output), qualifying for the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, well-structured description that explicitly covers both capability and trigger conditions with natural phrasing. Its main limitation is modest action specificity rather than any clarity or trigger deficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and two concrete actions ('Extract durable working preferences' and 'convert them into skills, rules, or workflow docs'), but coverage is not comprehensive enough for anchor 4's 'several specific actions'.

3 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (extract preferences and convert into skills/rules/docs) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause and concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural phrases users would say ('learn preferences', 'mine feedback', 'personalize workflows', 'generate team/person-specific agent guidance'), with a few synonyms missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear niche (mining Cursor chat preferences) with distinct triggers, but minor overlap risk with general skill-authoring skills on the 'convert into skills' half.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
cursor/plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.