Generate controlled vocabulary thesaurus for content domains. Creates comprehensive thesauri with preferred terms, broader/narrower/related terms.
60
51%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/generate-thesaurus/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description effectively communicates a specialized capability with good specificity and clear domain focus. However, it lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') which limits Claude's ability to know when to select this skill, and could benefit from more natural user-facing keywords beyond technical terminology.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger scenarios like 'Use when the user needs to organize terminology, create a taxonomy, or build term hierarchies for content management'
Include more natural keyword variations users might say: 'taxonomy', 'term hierarchy', 'vocabulary management', 'synonym lists', 'content classification'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Generate controlled vocabulary thesaurus', 'Creates comprehensive thesauri with preferred terms, broader/narrower/related terms'. These are specific, domain-appropriate actions. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers 'what' (generate thesauri with hierarchical term relationships) but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant technical terms like 'controlled vocabulary', 'thesaurus', 'preferred terms', 'broader/narrower/related terms', but misses common user variations like 'taxonomy', 'term hierarchy', 'vocabulary management', or simpler phrases users might say. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly specialized domain (controlled vocabulary/thesaurus creation) with distinct terminology unlikely to conflict with other skills. The specific mention of 'broader/narrower/related terms' clearly identifies this as information science/taxonomy work. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a conceptual framework for thesaurus generation but lacks the concrete, executable guidance needed for Claude to actually perform the task. The workflow describes what should happen without specifying how to implement it - no code for content analysis, term extraction algorithms, or file parsing. The example output is helpful but insufficient without implementation details.
Suggestions
Add executable code for content analysis and term extraction (e.g., Python scripts using NLP libraries or regex patterns for scanning files)
Provide concrete commands or tool calls for reading files from the specified PATH
Include a validation step to verify extracted terms and relationships before final output generation
Add specific examples of input content and the expected extracted terms to make the extraction process concrete
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., explaining what broader/narrower terms are with examples that Claude would already understand). The workflow steps could be more condensed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill describes what to do conceptually but provides no executable code or concrete commands. 'Analyze content' and 'scan documentation files' are vague instructions without implementation details or tools to use. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed in sequence but lack validation checkpoints. There's no guidance on how to verify extracted terms are correct, no error handling, and no feedback loop for refining the thesaurus. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections, but everything is inline. For a skill of this complexity, references to example templates or detailed format specifications could be split into separate files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
4d132c7
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.