Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable skill body dominated by executable commands and a complete code example, with a clear linear workflow and good sectioning. The main gap is the absence of an explicit validation/verification checkpoint in the discovery-to-code flow.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step after discovery (e.g., check that 'tools.json' or the markdown report was produced and lists expected resource types) before proceeding to edit src/mcp-servers.ts.
Trim the opening emphasized line so it does not restate the description's 'before writing agent code' trigger, or merge it into the H1 to reduce redundancy.
Consider noting how to confirm discovered MCP server URLs are reachable before wiring them into getMCPServers(), to strengthen the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — mostly executable commands, a compact table, and a code example with no concept explanations — but the opening emphasized line 'Run tool discovery BEFORE writing agent code to understand what resources are available' slightly overlaps the description, leaving minor trim opportunities that keep it just below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands ('npm run discover-tools -- --catalog ...'), a table of discovered resource types with concrete URL patterns, and a complete executable TypeScript example, covering the common cases per anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is a clear sequence (run discovery → review output → add servers in code → Next Steps: grant permissions, test, deploy), but there is no explicit validation checkpoint confirming discovery succeeded before editing code; since the operation is read-only the destructive cap does not apply, placing this at anchor 4 rather than 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Run Discovery, What Gets Discovered, Using Discovered Tools in Code, Next Steps) with appropriately inline reference material and clearly signaled pointers to peer skills; at ~74 lines with no bundle files it is slightly above the simple-skill threshold and lacks the one-level-deep reference structure of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |