Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable, with a well-sequenced validated workflow and excellent progressive disclosure to real reference files. The only meaningful weakness is conciseness: repeated emphasis of the same CLI gotchas and some coaching prose inflate the token budget.
Suggestions
State the bare-table-name and --dataset-catalog/--dataset-schema flag-only rules once in an authoritative location and cross-reference it instead of repeating the full explanation in Quick Reference, Step 2, Step 5 comments, and Implementation Guidelines.
Trim coaching prose such as "A good dashboard comes from knowing the data first. Spend time here — the exploration drives design decisions..." to directive guidance.
Consider moving the extended Theme & Color / palette-design rules into a reference file (e.g. references/7-theme-and-color.md) to shorten the body while keeping a concise 60/30/10 summary inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense with product-specific gotchas Claude does not know, but it includes coaching prose ("A good dashboard comes from knowing the data first. Spend time here...") and repeats the bare-table-name and flag-only rules across Quick Reference, Step 2, Step 5 comments, and Implementation Guidelines, which could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: exact databricks CLI commands with precise flags, copy-paste-ready JSON skeletons, and concrete examples covering create/update/publish/delete and widget definitions. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The NEW DASHBOARD CREATION WORKFLOW is a clear five-step sequence with explicit validation ("You MUST test ALL SQL queries via CLI BEFORE deploying", Step 3 verify-data checkpoint), a feedback loop ("If values don't match expectations... adjust the story before creating the dashboard"), and a 13-item Quality Checklist before deploy. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; the Widget Index and Reference Files tables map tasks to references/1-6 files, all of which exist on disk, and detailed widget specs are appropriately split out from the body. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |