Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured reference with concrete CLI commands throughout. Its main weakness is workflow validation: the destructive branch-deletion flow lacks verification checkpoints, which caps workflow clarity despite otherwise excellent sequencing and discovery guidance.
Suggestions
Add a post-deletion verification step to the destructive workflows (e.g., re-run `databricks postgres list-branches` after `delete-branch` to confirm the branch is gone), which would lift the workflow_clarity cap.
Add a pre-deletion safety check that confirms the exact resource name and that it is not the `production` branch before running `delete-branch`.
Trim the duplicated `-h` discovery instruction in the CLI Discovery section (stated in both the code comments and twice in prose) to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-first, assuming Claude's competence ("Do NOT guess command syntax. Discover available commands..."). Minor redundancy keeps it below anchor 5: the `databricks postgres -h` instruction is repeated in the code comments and twice in prose in the CLI Discovery section. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every common case has a copy-paste-ready command with concrete --json specs (create-project, create-branch, unprotect/delete, apps init). The reliance on `-h` for full flag discovery is explicitly justified flexibility for CLI version drift, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences are clear (create → verify auto-provisioned resources; discover branch/database → scaffold app), but the destructive delete-branch workflow (unprotect → delete) has no verification step confirming deletion or checking preconditions. Per the judging guidelines, missing validation on destructive operations caps workflow clarity at 3 even though the sequence itself is well-ordered. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the body self-contains its content with well-organized sections and clearly signaled pointers to the databricks-core parent and databricks-apps skills. It sits below anchor 5 only because at ~175 lines the "What's Next" app-scaffolding section is somewhat tangential material inlined in this skill, and the simple-skill exception (under 50 lines) does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |