Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with exact paths, fields, and commands arranged in a clear checklist, supported by a verification section. Its main gaps are minor repetition, missing error-recovery feedback loops, and a monolithic structure with no reference split.
Suggestions
Add explicit feedback loops in Verification Steps, e.g. "If `npm run build` or `npm test` fails, fix the error and re-run before packaging."
De-duplicate the "independent of qsv version" and three-place minimum_qsv_version sync points so each appears once (Core/Conditional) and the Important Notes only cross-reference.
Consider moving the Cowork Plugin detail block into a referenced file (e.g. COWORK.md) with a one-line pointer, to improve progressive disclosure and trim the main skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and checklist-driven with exact fields and commands, but it repeats the "independent of qsv" point and the three-place minimum_qsv_version sync, and spends lines explaining what a .plugin artifact is — it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives exact file paths, precise field names ("version":, MINIMUM_QSV_VERSION), and copy-paste-ready bash/git snippets plus npm commands — fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered checklist plus a Verification section sequences the work well, but there are no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops for this batch operation, which the rubric caps at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into labeled sections, but it is a monolithic single SKILL.md with no one-level-deep references and exceeds the 50-line simple-skill threshold, so file-level disclosure is absent. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |