Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly lean skill body with a clear sequenced workflow, validation checkpoint, and concrete examples. Gaps are minor: a non-bundled script reference in Example 3, the executable workflow living externally, and mild repetition of the read-only guarantee.
Suggestions
Remove the dangling 'scripts/check-data-quality.sh' reference in Example 3 (the scripts/ directory is not bundled) or add the script to the bundle.
State the read-only guarantee once (in the Overview or step 7) instead of repeating it across the description, Overview, and Instructions.
Inline or mirror the essential snippet of the canonical workflow so the skill remains executable when the external GitHub command file is unreachable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and task-focused with useful tables and examples, but the read-only guarantee is restated three times (description, Overview, step 7) — minor padding that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete CLI invocations, a report JSON example, and error shapes; however the embedded audit script lives in an external GitHub file and Example 3 references 'scripts/check-data-quality.sh' which is not in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit validation/stop checkpoint in step 3 ('stop and surface the error JSON as-is — do not guess a fix'); the read-only nature avoids the destructive-cap, though full feedback loops live in the external canonical file. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with a real one-level-deep reference (references/reference.md) and well-signaled sections; the dangling 'scripts/check-data-quality.sh' reference in Example 3 is a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |