Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable body with a clear validated workflow; the one weakness is progressive disclosure, because the prominently referenced `examples/` directory is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced `examples/before/` and `examples/after/` scripts so the body's pointers resolve to real files, or remove the directory listing and inline the one or two most representative example snippets.
If examples are intentionally omitted in this stripped bundle, note that they are illustrative paths rather than present files to avoid a dead reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: every section (contract schemas, field tables, rules of thumb) is task-specific and assumes Claude's competence, with no padding or explanation of basic concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance — concrete `jq` invocations, copy-paste `cp`/`chmod` commands, a complete piped mock-test snippet, and specific guard-clause idioms cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step 'Steps to add a hook' is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 5: sanity-test with a piped mock before relying on it) and a feedback rationale; no destructive/batch cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to an `examples/` directory (before/after subdirs) are clearly signaled and one level deep, but the referenced bundle directory does not exist in the skill, so the structure is not actually backed by real files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |