CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

brand-guidelines

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

70

2.77x
Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

100%

2.77x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/all-skills/skills/brand-guidelines/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

32%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body presents genuinely useful brand data (exact hex values, font roles) but is structured as descriptive feature documentation rather than actionable instructions: no code or procedure tells Claude how to apply the styling, and the same font facts are repeated across multiple sections. Consolidating the redundant sections and adding a concrete application example would substantially improve it.

Suggestions

Consolidate the Typography, Smart Font Application, and Font Management sections into one place — the Poppins/Arial and Lora/Georgia fallback facts are currently stated three times.

Add a concrete, executable example (e.g., a short python-pptx snippet using RGBColor(0xD9, 0x77, 0x57)) so the guidance instructs rather than merely describes.

Define a simple application workflow: how to detect background lightness, when to cycle orange/blue/green accents, and in what order to style headings, body text, and shapes.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The Poppins/Lora font and Arial/Georgia fallback facts are repeated across three separate sections (Typography, Smart Font Application, and Font Management), and "Features" and "Technical Details" largely duplicate each other, making the body noticeably padded rather than merely in need of minor tightening.

2 / 5

Actionability

Concrete specifics exist (hex color values, the 24pt heading threshold, "python-pptx's RGBColor class"), but the body contains no code, commands, or procedural steps — it describes what the styling does rather than instructing how to execute it, which is above the entirely-vague anchor yet well below executable guidance.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

No sequence is given for applying the styling (e.g., how "smart color selection based on background" works or when each accent is chosen), and the simple-skill exception does not apply because the single action is not unambiguous; this sits at a rough sense of what happens with steps poorly defined, not a listed sequence.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The self-contained body has clear section headers and no dangling references, approaching the well-organized short-skill ideal, but the font guidance duplicated across three sections is a minor organization gap that keeps it from the top anchor.

4 / 5

Total

10

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states both capability and explicit usage triggers in third person. Its main weaknesses are limited enumeration of specific actions and a few missing natural synonyms such as "branding" or "corporate identity".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography" names the domain and two concrete actions but enumerates no further specific actions, matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage rather than the 'several specific actions' of level 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact") and when ("Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger phrases "brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards" are natural user terms with good coverage, but common variations like "branding", "corporate identity", or "logo" are missing, so it falls just short of the comprehensive-synonyms anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Anthropic's look-and-feel" carves out a clear niche, but "any sort of artifact" and the broad trigger "visual formatting" create minor overlap risk with general formatting and design skills, placing it at mostly-distinct rather than minimal-conflict.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
davepoon/buildwithclaude
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.