CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

domain-name-brainstormer

Generates creative domain name ideas for your project and checks availability across multiple TLDs (.com, .io, .dev, .ai, etc.). Saves hours of brainstorming and manual checking.

64

1.05x
Quality

46%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.05x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/all-skills/skills/domain-name-brainstormer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is well-structured and gives example prompts and an output template, but it is verbose with general-knowledge padding and lacks an executable mechanism or validation steps for the availability-checking operation it claims to perform.

Suggestions

Remove or condense general-knowledge sections (TLD guide, 'what makes a good domain', generic tips) that Claude already knows, to improve token efficiency.

Specify how availability is actually checked (e.g., a command, API, or tool call) and add validation/error-handling steps for the batch availability operation.

Move the long example output and TLD reference into separate reference files to tighten the SKILL.md overview and strengthen progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body spends many lines explaining general knowledge Claude already has (what makes a good domain, TLD meanings, generic tips) and a heavily padded emoji-laden example output, fitting the 'noticeably verbose' anchor.

2 / 5

Actionability

Concrete example prompts and a defined output format are provided, but the core mechanism for actually generating names and checking availability is unspecified, leaving key details missing.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Numbered workflows are listed, but availability checking is a batch/external operation with no validation checkpoints or error-recovery loops, so workflow clarity is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single-file skill with clear, well-organized section headers and no need for external references; structure is good though some inline content (TLD guide, large example) could be split out.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concrete and distinct, naming the domain and two specific actions with good natural trigger keywords. Its main weakness is the missing explicit 'when to use' trigger clause, which caps completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause stating trigger situations (e.g., 'Use when starting a new project, rebranding, or when a chosen domain is taken').

Expand specificity by listing a third concrete action such as suggesting variations or branding insights to move from 1-2 actions toward comprehensive coverage.

Add common synonyms users might say (e.g., 'website name', 'URL', 'domain search') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and two concrete actions ('Generates creative domain name ideas', 'checks availability across multiple TLDs'), matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions rather than several.

3 / 5

Completeness

Provides a clear 'what' but no explicit 'when'/'Use when...' trigger clause; the closing value statement is not trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say ('domain name', 'domain name ideas') plus concrete extensions (.com, .io, .dev, .ai), giving good keyword coverage though a few synonyms are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The domain-name brainstorming plus TLD-availability niche is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against closely related naming/branding skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
davepoon/buildwithclaude
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.