CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

figma-automation

Automate Figma tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): files, components, design tokens, comments, exports. Always search tools first for current schemas.

76

2.34x
Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

96%

2.34x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/all-skills/skills/figma-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid reference skill for Figma automation via Rube MCP with well-organized workflows, clear tool sequencing, and useful pitfall documentation. Its main weaknesses are the lack of concrete executable examples (actual tool call invocations with sample parameters and expected responses) and some content redundancy. The single-file structure works but is on the edge of being too long for a single SKILL.md.

Suggestions

Add concrete example tool invocations with actual parameter values and sample response snippets, especially for the most common workflows like URL parsing and file retrieval.

Consolidate the duplicated pitfalls (e.g., node ID format, file type support) into a single location rather than repeating across workflow sections and the dedicated pitfalls section.

Consider extracting the quick reference table and detailed workflow pitfalls into a separate REFERENCE.md to keep SKILL.md focused on the essential getting-started flow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is generally well-structured but includes some redundancy—pitfalls are repeated (node ID format appears in individual workflows AND in a dedicated 'Known Pitfalls' section), and the quick reference table partially duplicates the workflow sections. Some sections could be tightened, but it doesn't over-explain concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides specific tool names, parameter names, and key details, but lacks executable code examples—workflows are described as numbered prose steps rather than concrete invocations with actual parameter values. The 'Common Patterns' section uses pseudocode-style numbered lists instead of showing actual tool calls with example inputs/outputs.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step workflows are clearly sequenced with labeled steps (Prerequisite, Required, Optional), include specific tool ordering, and pitfalls sections serve as validation guidance. The setup section has an explicit verification flow (check connection → auth → confirm ACTIVE before proceeding). The 'Node Traversal' pattern includes an iterative refinement approach.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized with clear sections and a useful quick reference table, but everything is in a single monolithic file with no bundle files for detailed reference. The workflows, pitfalls, and reference table could benefit from being split—the file is quite long. The external link to Composio docs is helpful but the skill itself could better leverage progressive disclosure with supporting files.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and lists specific Figma-related capabilities, making it clear what the skill does. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which would help Claude know exactly when to select this skill. The trigger terms could also be expanded to include more natural user language around design workflows.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause such as 'Use when the user asks about Figma designs, design tokens, exporting assets, or managing Figma components and comments.'

Include more natural user-facing trigger terms like 'design', 'UI', 'mockups', 'prototypes', or 'Figma project' to improve matching against typical user requests.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: files, components, design tokens, comments, exports. Also includes a concrete procedural instruction ('Always search tools first for current schemas').

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' (automate Figma tasks with specific capabilities listed), but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps this at 2 per the rubric.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords like 'Figma', 'components', 'design tokens', 'comments', 'exports', but misses common user variations like 'design', 'UI', 'mockups', 'prototypes', '.fig files'. 'Rube MCP (Composio)' is technical jargon unlikely to be used by users.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Very distinct niche: Figma automation via a specific MCP tool (Rube/Composio). Unlikely to conflict with other skills due to the specific platform and tooling mentioned.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
davepoon/buildwithclaude
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.