Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete tool slugs, parameters, and JQL examples, but suffers from minor duplication and lacks validation feedback loops on write operations, with everything kept in one inline file.
Suggestions
Add validate-then-retry feedback loops (e.g., verify an issue was created via JIRA_GET_ISSUE before proceeding) for destructive/batch operations like create, edit, assign, and move-to-sprint.
De-duplicate the custom-field pitfall ('customfield_10001', 'use JIRA_GET_FIELDS') that appears both inline and in the 'Known Pitfalls' section.
Consider moving the full Quick Reference table or per-workflow detail into a referenced reference file to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean with tight tool sequences and parameter lists, but tool slugs are duplicated across the workflow sections and the Quick Reference table, and 'Known Pitfalls' repeats custom-field guidance already stated inline — could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact tool slugs, named parameters, real JQL examples ('project = "PROJ" AND status = "In Progress"', 'created >= -7d'), and a copy-paste-ready quick reference table. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Tool sequences are clearly numbered with [Required]/[Optional] tags and the Setup section has a verification checkpoint, but write operations (create/edit/assign/move-to-sprint) lack validate-then-retry feedback loops, capping clarity at 2 for destructive/batch work. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single cohesive file with clear section organization and a Quick Reference index, but all content is inline with no one-level-deep referenced files; workflow detail that could be externalized keeps it from a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |