CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

microsoft-teams-automation

Automate Microsoft Teams tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): send messages, manage channels, create meetings, handle chats, and search messages. Always search tools first for current schemas.

75

1.46x
Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

95%

1.46x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/all-skills/skills/microsoft-teams-automation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid reference skill for Microsoft Teams automation with well-structured workflows, clear tool sequences, and thorough pitfall documentation. Its main weaknesses are verbosity (redundant pitfall information across sections) and lack of concrete executable examples showing actual tool invocations with sample parameters. The monolithic structure could benefit from splitting detailed reference material into separate files.

Suggestions

Add at least one concrete tool invocation example with actual parameter values (e.g., a complete RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS call and a TEAMS_POST_CHANNEL_MESSAGE call with sample inputs) to improve actionability.

Consolidate the per-workflow pitfalls and the 'Known Pitfalls' section to eliminate redundancy around ID formats, rate limits, and pagination—mention them once in a shared section and reference it.

Consider splitting the Quick Reference table and Common Patterns into a separate REFERENCE.md file to reduce the main skill's token footprint and improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is reasonably well-structured but quite lengthy (~200+ lines). There's some redundancy between the 'Known Pitfalls' section and the per-workflow pitfalls sections (e.g., ID formats, rate limits, pagination are repeated). The quick reference table is useful but adds bulk. Some content like explaining what UUID format looks like is borderline unnecessary for Claude.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides clear tool sequences with named tools and key parameters, which is good. However, there are no executable code examples—the 'Common Patterns' sections use plain text pseudocode rather than actual tool invocation examples with concrete parameter values. The instruction to 'always call RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS first' is actionable but no example call is shown.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step workflows are clearly sequenced with numbered steps, labeled as [Required], [Optional], and [Prerequisite]. Each workflow includes specific pitfalls and error conditions (403, 429, 400/413). The setup section includes a validation checkpoint (confirm ACTIVE status before proceeding). Pagination handling includes clear termination conditions.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is entirely monolithic in a single file with no bundle files. For a skill this long (~200+ lines), the detailed per-workflow pitfalls, common patterns, and the full quick reference table could be split into separate reference files. The external link to Composio docs is helpful but the skill itself would benefit from better content splitting.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description does a good job listing specific capabilities for Microsoft Teams automation and is clearly distinguishable from other skills due to the platform and integration specificity. However, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause which caps completeness, and the trigger terms could be broader to capture more natural user language patterns.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to automate Teams workflows, send Teams messages, schedule Teams meetings, or manage Teams channels.'

Include more natural user-facing trigger terms like 'Teams call', 'schedule a meeting in Teams', 'DM on Teams', 'Teams notification', or 'team collaboration'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: send messages, manage channels, create meetings, handle chats, and search messages. Also includes the operational instruction to search tools first for current schemas.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what does this do' with specific actions, but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance. The 'when' is only implied by the action descriptions.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms like 'Microsoft Teams', 'messages', 'channels', 'meetings', 'chats', but misses common variations users might say such as 'Teams call', 'schedule a meeting', 'DM', 'team chat', or 'Teams notification'. Also mentions 'Rube MCP (Composio)' which is technical jargon unlikely to be used by end users.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clearly scoped to Microsoft Teams via a specific integration (Rube MCP/Composio), making it highly distinct. The combination of platform (Teams) and integration method creates a clear niche unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
davepoon/buildwithclaude
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.