Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestrator body with concrete steps and clear approval gates, but workflow clarity is capped by a destructive commit path (direct mode) that skips verification and lacks an error-recovery loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification/error-recovery loop (e.g., verifier failure → fix → re-verify) and require verification before the committer runs in every execution mode, including 'direct'.
Template the sub-agent invocation prompts (or link to where they live) so the builder/verifier/committer calls are copy-paste ready rather than just named.
Tighten the duplicated trigger statement (intro vs. 'Trigger Detection') and consolidate the REFERENCES_DIR explanation into one place to remove redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining known concepts; minor redundancy in restating the trigger condition and the REFERENCES_DIR rationale in two places. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete guidance — a specific file path, a REFERENCES_DIR derivation formula, named agents in sequence, and explicit approval gates — with the gap that sub-agent invocation prompts are not templated. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered sequence and approval STOPs are clear, but the 'direct' mode runs builder→committer (a destructive commit) with no verifier and no error-recovery feedback loop is described, so the destructive-operations cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview with well-organized sections and a signaled one-level-deep reference to agent-flow.md; minor gap is the cross-skill path dependency and absence of a local bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |