Conciseness

The body is dense and almost entirely suite-specific knowledge Claude cannot know (symlink/canonical-path resolution, hidden catalog entries, sibling verification), with only minor trimmable bookkeeping ("Claude users retain the original manual commands named by each child's frontmatter"; the "/daymade-claude-code:fixing-claude-export-conversations" exposure detail). This matches anchor 4 (efficient, minor instances that could be trimmed) rather than anchor 3, which would require a genuinely unnecessary explanation.

Actionability

Provides concrete, near-executable guidance: a table of eight exact sibling paths ("Read this exact file" → "../claude-skills-troubleshooting/SKILL.md"), explicit verification steps ("verify it is a direct sibling `SKILL.md` inside the root"), and worked routing examples ("usage diagnosis selects `claude-usage-analyst`"). It falls short of anchor 5 only because "Locate **this loaded** ... in the active catalog or invocation" gives no concrete mechanism and the `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` advice is hedged ("may help ... but it is absent in Codex").

Workflow Clarity

The routing procedure is clearly sequenced (identify operation → locate/verify router path → resolve sibling path → verify sibling → read child in full → follow it) with explicit validation checkpoints and error-recovery feedback: "Stop if the active router path cannot be identified unambiguously" and "Continue a truncated read". This matches anchor 5 (clear sequence, explicit validation, error-recovery loops); routing is not a destructive or batch operation, so no cap applies.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and well organized (heading, resolution procedure, navigation table, routing examples, scope boundaries), with no bundle files needing external references. The routing table itself is well-signaled one-level-deep navigation ("Read this exact file" → each sibling SKILL.md), matching anchor 5 and the simple-skill exception.

Specificity

Names many concrete operations ("plugin/Skill repair, marketplace, statusline, model profiles/source sync, ... usage/quota reset ping, memory→docs, .txt repair, MCP startup context") plus the explicit action "Routes Claude Code to one bundled specialist, including turning auto memory off". The telegraphic noun-phrase style ("memory→docs", "source sync") leaves some actions implicit, so it matches anchor 4 (several specific actions, minor gaps) rather than anchor 5's comprehensive concrete action coverage.

Completeness

The "what" is clear (routes nine named operation types to one bundled specialist), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance; the "when" is only weakly implied by the operation list. Per the judging guidelines a missing "Use when..." clause caps completeness at 3, matching anchor 3 (clear "what", "when" missing or only weakly implied) rather than anchor 4's explicit "when".

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms Claude Code users would actually say — "statusline", "marketplace", "usage", "quota", "plugin/Skill repair", "1M/[1m]", ".txt", "MCP" — giving good keyword coverage. Common variations are missing ("fix", "broken", "won't load/activate", ".md"), which fits anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's comprehensive synonym and extension coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The explicit negative boundary ("History, hooks, and Lark keep their own entries") and the enumerated specialist domains give it a defined niche. However, the description spans many domains (repair, marketplace, statusline, models, usage, memory, .txt, MCP, ping), leaving minor overlap risk with closely related per-domain skills — anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's minimal conflict risk.