CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

competitive-intel-watch

Scheduled delta monitoring against a prior competitive snapshot. Use when tracking competitors on a cadence: material shifts only, cited evidence, battle-card update flags, runs unattended.

68

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable workflow skill with a copy-paste output schema, clear sequenced steps, and good progressive disclosure to template/example files. The main weakness is rhetorical flourish in the framing sections that adds tokens without adding instructional value.

Suggestions

Trim motivational asides in Purpose and Key Concepts (e.g. 'regenerating the same report weekly is theater', 'a watch that cries wolf gets ignored by cycle three') to discipline statements without the color, recovering tokens for context budget.

Keep the 'Why it matters' notes only where they change behavior; where the rule is self-evident from the do-not-invent list, drop the rationale.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Assumes Claude's competence (uses SIGINT/OSINT/HUMINT/FININT/TECHINT without over-explaining, no basic-concept padding), but includes rhetorical flourishes that could be trimmed — 'regenerating the same report weekly is theater', 'a watch that cries wolf gets ignored by cycle three — the bar is what keeps the audience' — matching the mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened anchor; not 3 because those motivational asides don't each earn their tokens.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste-ready output schema with fill-in slots, six sequenced Application steps, a 4-option Final Step, and specific worked examples (a bar-clearing changelog entry and the empty changelog), matching the anchor for specific, copy-paste-ready guidance; not 2 because the guidance is complete and concrete rather than pseudocode-level.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear six-step sequence with explicit checkpoints — a search-plan gate ('Continue unless revised'), the materiality-bar filter, Fact/Inference/Assumption labels — and the output schema acting as a checklist, matching the clear-sequence-with-checkpoints anchor; not 2 because validation/quality gates are explicit, and the task is not a destructive/batch operation requiring a fix-retry loop.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Body is organized into clear sections and offloads the fill-in template to template.md and worked runs to examples/sample.md and examples/sample-industrial.md as one-level-deep, clearly signaled references, matching the well-signaled-one-level-deep anchor; not 2 because content is appropriately split rather than inlined. (The referenced bundle files are not present in this review directory to physically verify, but the in-body structure is sound.)

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that answers what and when with an explicit trigger and a distinct niche. The only gap is trigger-term breadth, which leans on a single phrasing rather than covering the common variations users might say.

Suggestions

Broaden the trigger clause to include natural variations users would say, e.g. 'Use when tracking competitors on a cadence, running a competitor watch, or checking what changed since the last snapshot'.

Consider adding 'battle card' or 'positioning' as explicit trigger terms since those artifacts are the skill's downstream consumers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities ('delta monitoring against a prior competitive snapshot', 'cited evidence', 'battle-card update flags', 'runs unattended') rather than vague language, matching the anchor for several specific concrete actions; not 2 because the action coverage is comprehensive rather than partial.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what it does ('Scheduled delta monitoring against a prior competitive snapshot...material shifts only, cited evidence, battle-card update flags') and when to use it via an explicit 'Use when tracking competitors on a cadence' trigger, matching the anchor for both what and when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'Use when tracking competitors on a cadence' is a natural trigger, but coverage is thin and misses common variations a user would say ('competitor watch', 'what changed', 'monitor competitors'), matching the anchor for some relevant keywords with missing variations; not 3 due to limited breadth.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (delta monitoring against a prior snapshot with battle-card update flags) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the clear-niche anchor; not 2 because the delta/battle-card framing is specific rather than overlapping.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 3 missing, 9 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.