Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, highly actionable interactive coaching skill with a clear branched workflow and concrete example outputs. Its main weaknesses are some duplication and repeated scaffolding affecting conciseness, and progressive disclosure is hurt by references pointing to non-existent bundle files and lengthy inline worked examples that could be split out.
Suggestions
Remove the near-verbatim duplication between the frontmatter 'intent' and the Purpose section, or repurpose Purpose to add only new information.
Create the referenced examples/conversation-flow.md file (or drop the reference) so the bundle matches what the body points to, and consider moving the four full worked-example recommendation blocks into per-branch reference files to slim the main SKILL.md.
Tighten the repeated question-scaffolding across the four branches (e.g., factor the shared 'Or describe your situation directly' / 'Choose a number to go deeper' framing) to reduce token cost.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is substantive coaching content that mostly earns its tokens, but the Purpose section duplicates the frontmatter intent nearly verbatim and the four branches repeat scaffolding patterns; it could be tightened, fitting 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' — not 4 due to the duplicated intent and repeated structure. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only interactive skill it provides concrete question scripts, numbered response options, and full worked example recommendation outputs that are copy-ready and cover the common cases, matching the 'fully executable; specific examples cover the common cases' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is clearly sequenced (Step 0 → Q1 → branch Q2/Q3 → recommendations) with progress labels and explicit branching, fitting 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'; not 5 because there are no explicit feedback/validation loops, though the coaching Q&A nature does not strictly require them. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are signaled (examples/conversation-flow.md, altitude-horizon-framework, workshop-facilitation) but none of the referenced files exist in the bundle, and the full inlined worked-example recommendation scripts for all four branches are lengthy content that could live in separate files, fitting 'some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |