CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

feature-investment-advisor

Evaluate feature investments using revenue impact, cost structure, ROI, and strategy. Use when deciding whether a feature deserves investment.

66

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced interactive skill with concrete formulas and worked examples, but it is verbose with notable redundancy and relies on a single large file plus referenced bundles that do not actually exist.

Suggestions

Trim redundancy: remove the verbatim restatement of the frontmatter intent in the Purpose section and consolidate the Anti-Patterns list with the overlapping Common Pitfalls to cut roughly 100+ lines.

Move the four full recommendation-pattern templates and the three worked examples into separate reference files (e.g., references/recommendation-patterns.md, examples/) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with one-level-deep links.

Either supply the referenced examples/ folder and workshop-facilitation skill or drop the dangling references, since progressive disclosure suffers from links that resolve to nothing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~650-line body repeats content across sections (the Purpose paragraph restates the frontmatter intent verbatim, and the 10 pitfalls overlap the Anti-Patterns list) and explains some PM fundamentals Claude already knows, fitting the 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' anchor rather than the lean top anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully concrete, executable guidance — explicit formulas like 'Potential Monthly Revenue = Customer Base × Adoption Rate × Price,' enumerated decision options, ROI thresholds (e.g., '>3:1'), and worked numerical examples — matching the 'fully executable; specific examples' anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps 0–5 are clearly sequenced with adaptive branches and explicit decision criteria, and the recommendation patterns each carry trigger conditions; the advisory (non-destructive, non-batch) nature means the missing-validation cap does not apply, reaching the 'clear sequence with explicit checkpoints' anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

It is a monolithic single file with no actual bundle files present (references/scripts/assets/examples directories do not exist), yet it references examples/ and other paths that are absent, and content that could be split (pitfalls, recommendation patterns, worked examples) is inline — matching the 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' anchor.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions with concrete analytical dimensions. Its main weakness is trigger-term breadth, which covers the core need but omits common phrasings users would actually say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete analytical actions — 'revenue impact, cost structure, ROI, and strategy' — matching the 'multiple specific concrete actions' anchor rather than the vague or partial anchors.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ('Evaluate feature investments using revenue impact, cost structure, ROI, and strategy') and when ('Use when deciding whether a feature deserves investment'), matching the 'clearly answers both what AND when with explicit triggers' anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes relevant keywords ('feature,' 'investment,' 'ROI') in 'Use when deciding whether a feature deserves investment,' but misses common variations a user would say like 'prioritize,' 'build vs buy,' or 'roadmap request,' landing on the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The financial/ROI feature-evaluation niche is specific with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers; unlikely to conflict' anchor.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

skill_md_line_count

SKILL.md is long (652 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.