Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workshop protocol that is held back by verbosity and weak progressive disclosure. Conceptual padding duplicates known material and the frontmatter intent, while a referenced template.md is missing from the bundle and bulk content that belongs in it is inlined.
Suggestions
Trim the Key Concepts, Why This Works, Anti-Patterns, and Common Pitfalls sections to the non-obvious essentials (or move them into a reference file) and remove the Purpose section that duplicates the frontmatter intent verbatim.
Either ship the referenced template.md containing the facilitation agenda and output checklist, or remove the dangling 'Use template.md' reference and keep that content inline under a clearly signaled section.
Make the per-question approval gates explicit validate-fix-retry loops (e.g., 'If the user requests changes, regenerate the backbone and re-confirm before proceeding to Q4') to lift workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Noticeably verbose: the Purpose section duplicates the frontmatter intent verbatim, and Key Concepts / Why This Works / Anti-Patterns / five Common Pitfalls explain standard Patton story-mapping concepts Claude already knows, with the pitfalls largely restating the anti-patterns. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable facilitation protocol: exact agent prompts per question, 3-4 enumerated options with concrete examples, ASCII backbone/task trees, a full release-slice example, and a copy-paste-ready markdown output template. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (Step 0 -> Q1-Q5 -> Output) with per-question approval gates ('User response: [Approve, modify, or add custom...]'), but error-recovery feedback loops are implicit rather than explicitly framed as validate-fix-retry. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-sectioned internally, but the body tells the reader to 'Use template.md for the facilitation agenda and outputs checklist' while no template.md exists in the bundle, and the full output template, examples, and pitfalls are inlined rather than split into that referenced file. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |