Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured facilitation protocol with concrete, actionable guidance and a clear multi-step workflow. Main weaknesses are minor: duplicated frontmatter intent in Purpose, and a referenced transcript file that is missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Remove the Purpose section or replace it with non-duplicated content, since it repeats the frontmatter intent verbatim.
Either add the referenced examples/inline-input-flow.md file or drop the broken link, so the one external reference resolves.
Tighten the overlap between Key Concepts and the Application steps so each section adds distinct value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Purpose section duplicates the frontmatter intent verbatim and the Key Concepts bullets overlap with the Application steps. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance — specific entry modes, exact progress labels ('Context Qx/8', 'Scoring Qx/5'), selection syntax ('#1', '1,3', '1 and 3'), and copy-ready example dialogue — with the one gap that the referenced full transcript file does not exist. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 12-step facilitation procedure with explicit checkpoints (per-turn progress labels, decision points, interruption handling, stop/pause), though fast-path and resume details are lighter than the main loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with content appropriately kept inline for a protocol skill; the single external reference (examples/inline-input-flow.md) is clearly signaled but the file is absent from the bundle, a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |