Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable facilitation protocol with a clear multi-step workflow and concrete examples. The only real gap is a dangling reference to a missing examples file, which keeps progressive disclosure from a top score.
Suggestions
Create the referenced 'examples/inline-input-flow.md' file (or remove the link) so the one-level-deep reference resolves and navigation is trustworthy.
If additional detail grows, move the worked 'Examples' section into a separate examples file referenced one level deep, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-structured with bullet lists and short examples, assuming Claude's intelligence and avoiding padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, executable guidance — exact progress label formats ('Context Qx/8', 'Scoring Qx/5'), explicit selection parsing ('#1', '1 and 3', '1,3'), and worked dialogue examples — so absent code is not penalized. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 12-step numbered sequence with explicit checkpoints and feedback loops: interrupt handling ('halt immediately and wait for explicit resume'), meta-question handling, and an 'Assumptions to Validate' end-state for best-guess mode. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized (Purpose, Input, Key Concepts, Application, Examples, Pitfalls, References), but the body references a bundle file '[examples/inline-input-flow.md](examples/inline-input-flow.md)' that does not exist in the bundle, so navigation is not actually resolvable. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |