Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is dense, executable, and well-structured: it states repo status, gives a working code path, and lays out a concrete extension workflow. The only gap is an implicit rather than explicit validate-fix-retry loop in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop to the workflow (e.g. 'If tests fail, fix the new models/params and re-run before proceeding') to move workflow_clarity from 4 to 5.
Consider splitting the long 'Key params currently available' line into a small table or a reference file if more params are added later, to keep the overview scannable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and repo-specific throughout — current status, key params, gotchas, and references add facts Claude would not already know, with no padding about what WebSockets or libraries are. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready C# LiveSchema example and a workflow with concrete file paths (e.g. 'Deepgram/Models/Listen/v2/WebSocket/LiveSchema.cs', 'examples/speech-to-text/websocket/flux/Program.cs') covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step 'adding Flux support' workflow is clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints ('Validate against the AsyncAPI spec', 'Verify field names match', 'Write tests'), but lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep References list pointing to real in-repo paths and external docs; no bundle files are present, but the ~90-line self-contained body is appropriately structured. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |