Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, largely executable SDK skill: one complete copy-paste REST example, an explicit WebSocket lifecycle, concrete gotchas, and cleanly layered one-level-deep references. The main weaknesses are the pseudo-code streaming section in the live example, duplicated Go boilerplate, and dense inline parameter/lifecycle material that could move to a reference file.
Suggestions
Make the WebSocket example's streaming loop real (executable write/finalize calls over a file reader) instead of pseudo-code comments, so both quick-start paths are copy-paste runnable.
Trim the repeated `package main` / `log.Fatal(err)` boilerplate from the examples and condense the "Central product skills" section to a single line.
Move the detailed options-field and constructor-family listings into a one-level-deep reference file, keeping only the most common fields inline in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean — compact gotchas, parameter lists, and a layered reference section with no beginner-concept padding. Minor over-explanation remains: duplicated `package main`/`log.Fatal` boilerplate across both examples and the semi-promotional "Central product skills" section could be trimmed. Not 5 because those tokens are not all load-bearing. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The REST example is fully executable and copy-paste ready, and constructor families, in-repo example paths, and gotchas are concrete. The WebSocket example's core streaming loop is explicitly pseudo-code comments ("For example (pseudo-code)"), a minor gap that keeps it below 5 but above 3 since one complete path exists. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The live-streaming lifecycle is explicitly sequenced ("`Connect()` returns `bool`; call `Start()`, stream/write audio, `KeepAlive()` as needed, `Finalize()`, then `defer conn.Stop()`") and reinforced in gotchas. Not a destructive/batch operation so the validation cap does not apply; it falls short of 5 only for lacking error-recovery/feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the body's references are clearly layered one level deep ("API reference (layered)" from in-repo files to OpenAPI/AsyncAPI to product docs, plus concrete example file paths). Structure is good with clear sections; minor gaps in that the parameters/lifecycle material is dense inline and the skill runs long where a reference file could carry detail. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |