Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary code skill body: dense, executable, copy-paste-ready examples for every API path (REST, WSS, async, TextBuilder), correct gotchas stated as terse imperatives, and well-organized layered references. The only weaknesses are the missing in-bundle `reference.md` (referenced but absent) and the absence of explicit error-recovery guidance for the streaming path.
Suggestions
Add `reference.md` (or move it into a `references/` directory and update the pointer) so the primary layered reference in 'API reference (layered)' actually resolves from the skill bundle.
Add a short error-recovery note for the WebSocket path (e.g., what to do on an ERROR event or dropped connection before audio completes) to give the streaming workflow an explicit validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout: code-first sections ('Quick start — REST', 'Quick start — WebSocket'), a one-line auth warning ('Header: `Authorization: Token <api_key>` (NOT `Bearer`)'), a compact 'Key parameters' line, and a numbered 'Gotchas' list — no explanation of concepts Claude already knows and every token earns its place. Not score 4 because there is no over-explanatory passage to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready code for all four common cases (REST sync, WSS sync, TextBuilder fluent API, async equivalents), plus concrete operational facts (response is audio bytes not JSON, useful headers `dg-model-name`/`dg-char-count`, 'There is no `.add(...)` method'). Not score 4: the examples are complete and runnable as written, covering the common paths end to end. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The WSS flow gives a correctly sequenced path with an explicit ordering checkpoint: 'send all text + flush + close BEFORE calling it, OR run it in a thread', reinforced by gotcha #3 ('`send_close()` without `send_flush()` may drop trailing audio') and #4. Not score 5 because there are no explicit validation/error-recovery steps (e.g., what to do when the ERROR event fires mid-stream); not score 3 because sequence and ordering constraints are explicit, and there are no destructive or batch operations that would require a feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure: clear section headers, and a layered 'API reference' section numbered 1–5 pointing one level deep to the in-repo `reference.md`, OpenAPI/AsyncAPI URLs, Context7, and product docs. Not score 5 because the referenced `reference.md` is not present in the skill bundle (no references/ directory exists), so the primary layered reference cannot be verified, and a moderate amount of API surface (parameter list, gotchas) is inlined rather than split out. Not score 3: references are clearly signaled and organized, not buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |