Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-organized but its examples lean on literal placeholders and lack flag-usage examples or validation steps for destructive operations like stop/rotate. Swapping placeholders for real invocations and adding verification steps would lift actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Replace placeholder examples with real invocations, e.g. 'omniroute tunnel create ngrok' and 'omniroute tunnel stop ngrok --yes'.
Show at least one command with a flag applied, e.g. 'omniroute tunnel list --json' or 'omniroute tunnel logs ngrok --tail 50'.
Add a brief validation/confirmation step for destructive commands (e.g. 'Verify with `tunnel status <type>` after stop/rotate').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean flag lists and bare command examples with no concept padding; the duplicated Overview and literal '[type]' placeholders are the only minor excess that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and runnable, but 'tunnel create [type]' shows a literal placeholder instead of a real invocation (e.g. 'tunnel create ngrok'), and flag usage is listed without an example applying it. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Subcommands are clearly enumerated but there is no multi-step sequence, and stop/rotate operations lack validation/confirmation checkpoints, so workflow clarity is capped at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, under-50-line skill with well-organized sections and no need for external references; structure is clean and navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |