Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally lean and actionable review checklist: concrete detection patterns, explicit severity and report contracts, clear scope and exclusions, and built-in anti-fabrication guidance (zero findings is valid). The only structural gap is that the extensive rule-family checklists are entirely inlined with no progressive-disclosure split, which is defensible for a scan-all-rules pass but leaves minor organization headroom.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense, terse checklist where every bullet is a distinct detection heuristic (e.g. "Faint body/label ink (`text-gray-400`...) — V1, V2") with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Each token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor rather than 4, which reserves room for trimmable over-explanation that is absent here. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully executable: concrete grep-able patterns (`text-gray-400`, `outline: none`, `border` + `box-shadow`), specific paths to check (`apps/app/src/components/ui/`), pixel thresholds (320px, 305px usable), an explicit severity mapping (medium/low, never high), and a defined report format. Matches 'specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single task is unambiguous with an explicit first step ("Read `DESIGN.md` at the repository root first") and pre-report validation checkpoints such as "Grep `apps/app/src/components/ui/` before reporting" and the screenshot-evidence rule, plus confidence tiering between medium and low. Not 4 because no validation checkpoint material to this advisory workflow is missing; destructive/batch feedback-loop caps do not apply to a read-only review. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized (What to check, Do NOT report, Report format) and there are no broken or buried references since no bundle files exist, but roughly 100 lines of per-rule-family heuristics are inlined in SKILL.md with no split into reference files. This fits 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'; not 5 because content is not split into one-level-deep references, and the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not apply to a ~138-line body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |